Expanding the continuum of substance use disorder treatment: Nonabstinence approaches PMC

The use of behavioral therapy components has become so widespread that these components are often included in different concentrations and forms in various intervention delivery formats, including telephone, Internet-based, psychotherapeutic, and brief advice interventions. Most the abstinence violation effect refers to recently, it has been recommended that behavioral treatment and pharmacotherapy be combined to maximize the effects of both types of interventions [23•]. Such combined interventions have been found to further reduce the risk of relapse following intervention delivery [22].

If you’re worried you might be heading towards a lapse or full-blown relapse, don’t struggle with this alone. If you’re currently lost within the confusion of the abstinence violation effect, we can help. The abstinence violation effect occurs when an individual has a lapse in their recovery. Instead of learning and growing from their mistake, an individual may believe that they are unable to complete a successful recovery and feel shame and guilt.

Financial support and sponsorship

Therapy focuses on providing the individual the necessary skills to prevent a lapse from escalating into a relapse31. Problem solving therapy (PST) is a cognitive behavioural program that addresses interpersonal problems and other problem situations that may trigger stress and thereby increase probability of the addictive behaviour. The four key elements of PST are problem identification, generating alternatives, decision making, implementing solutions, reviewing outcomes and revising steps where needed. Problem orientation must also be addressed in addition to these steps, and the efficacy of PST increases when problem orientation is addressed in addition to the other steps25,26. An individual progresses through various stages of changes and the movement is influenced by several factors. Stages imply a readiness to change and therefore the TTM has been particularly relevant in the timing of interventions.

Interpersonal relationships and support systems are highly influenced by intrapersonal processes such as emotion, coping, and expectancies18. Another example is Taylor, who has been doing a wonderful job taking walks and engaging in healthier eating. Taylor uses an app to watch her intake of calorie limit and does see positive outcomes to her new lifestyle. One night, she craves pizza and wings, orders out, and goes over her calories for the day. Knowing that can be disheartening, but it can also cause you to relapse out of the belief that relapse is inevitable.

How The Abstinence Violation Effect Occurs

It occurs when the client perceives no intermediary step between a lapse and relapse i.e. since they have violated the rule of abstinence, “they may get most out” of the lapse5. People who attribute the lapse to their own personal failure are likely to experience guilt and negative emotions that can, in turn, lead to increased drinking as a further attempt to avoid or escape the feelings of guilt or failure7. In the 1970s, the pioneering work of a small number of alcohol researchers began to challenge the existing abstinence-based paradigm in AUD treatment research. They found that their controlled drinking intervention produced significantly better outcomes compared to usual treatment, and that about a quarter of the individuals in this condition maintained controlled drinking for one year post treatment (Sobell & Sobell, 1973).

In the smoking cessation literature, smoking reduction has been described as a harmreduction approach for smokers who are unwilling to quit [35], and also as a means of “cuttingdown toquit” for smokers who are interested in quitting but not prepared for an abrupt smoking stop [36•]. These approaches have not yet been endorsed in best-practice guidelines [23•, 37] and should be used with caution [35]. However, a recent meta-analysis showed that use of NRT (with or without motivational intervention components) as a means to help nontreatment-seeking smokers to reduce or quit was two times more effective in achieving longer-term, 6-month abstinence rates than placebo [36•].

Defining and Differentiating Smoking Cessation and Relapse Prevention

Motivation enhancement therapy (MET) is a brief, program of two to four sessions, usually held before other treatment approaches, so as to enhance treatment response24. MET adopts several social cognitive as well as Rogerian principles in its approach and in keeping with the social cognitive theory, personal agency is emphasized. The harm reduction movement, and the wider shift toward addressing public health impacts of drug use, had both specific and diffuse effects on SUD treatment research.

Encouragement and understanding from friends, family, or support groups can help individuals overcome the negative emotional aftermath of the AVE. There may be an internal conflict between resisting thoughts about drugs and compulsions to use them. There is a possibility that you might rationalize why you might not experience the same consequences if you continue to use. Contrasting https://ecosoberhouse.com/ this, the aforementioned negative mindsets can lead to a cycle of blame and shame. Instead of looking at the slip as an opportunity to grow and learn, a person lets it color the way they think about themselves. An individual who believes they’ve failed and violated their sobriety goals may begin to think that they’re not good enough to be considered a true abstainer.